President Trump is throwing a bomb into the insurance marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act, choosing to end critical payments to health insurers that help millions of lower-income Americans afford coverage. The decision coincides with an executive order on Thursday to allow alternative health plans that skirt the lawâs requirements.
The White House confirmed late Thursday that it would halt federal payments for cost-sharing reductions, although a statement did not specify when. Another statement a short time later by top officials at the Health and Human Services Department said the cutoff would be immediate. The subsidies total about $7Â billion this year.
Trump has threatened for months to stop the payments, which go to insurers that are required by the law to help eligible consumers afford their deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. But he held off while other administration officials warned him such a move would cause an implosion of the ACA marketplaces that could be blamed on Republicans, according to two individuals briefed on the decision.
Health insurers and state regulators have been in a state of high anxiety over the prospect of the marketplaces cratering because of such White House action. The fifth yearâs open-enrollment season for consumers to buy coverage through ACA exchanges will start in less than three weeks, and insurers have said that stopping the cost-sharing payments would be the single greatest step the Trump administration could take to damage the marketplaces â and the law.
Ending the payments is grounds for any insurer to back out of its federal contract to sell health plans for 2018. Some statesâ regulators directed ACA insurers to add a surcharge in case the payments were not made, but insurers elsewhere could be left in a position in which they still must give consumers the discounts but will not be reimbursed.
A spokeswoman for Americaâs Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade group that has been warning for months of adverse effects if the payments ended, immediately denounced the presidentâs decision. âMillions of Americans rely on these benefitsÂ to afford their coverage and care,â Kristine Grow said.
And California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D), who has been trying to preserve the payments through litigation, said the presidentâs action âwould be sabotage.â Becerra said late Thursday that he was prepared to fight the White House. âWeâve taken the Trump Administration to court before and won, and weâre ready to do it again if necessary,â he said in a statement.
Trumpâs move comes even as bipartisan negotiations continue on one Senate committee over ways to prop up the ACA marketplaces. Both Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) have publicly said the payments should not end immediately, though they differ over how long these subsidies should be guaranteed.
The cost-sharing reductions â or CSRs, as they are known â have long been the subject of a political and legal seesaw. Congressional Republicans argued that the sprawling 2010 health-care law that established them does not include specific language providing appropriations to cover the governmentâs cost. House Republicans sued HHS over the payments during President Barack Obamaâs second term. A federal court agreed that they were illegal, and the case has been pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
âThe bailout of insurance companies through these unlawful payments is yet another example of how the previous administration abused taxpayer dollars and skirted the law to prop up a broken system,â a statement from the White House said. âCongress needs to repeal and replace the disastrous Obamacare law and provide real relief to the American people.â
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a statement that the administration was dropping its appeal of the lawsuit â something the White House did not mention in its announcement. Ryan called the move to end to the court case âa monumental affirmation of Congressâs authority and the separation of powers.â
Â Meanwhile, the top two congressional Democrats, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), excoriated the presidentâs decision. âIt is a spiteful act of vast, pointless sabotage leveled at working families and the middle class in every corner of America,â they said in a joint statement. âMake no mistake about it, Trump will try to blame the Affordable Care Act, but this will fall on his back and he will pay the price for it.â
For months, administration officials have debated privately about what to do. The president has consistently pushed to stop the payments, according to officials and advisers who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. Some top health officials within the administration, including former HHS secretary Tom Price, cautioned that this could exacerbate already escalating ACA plan premiums, these Republicans said. But some government lawyers argued that the payments were not authorized under the existing law, according to one administration official, and would be difficult to keep defending in court.
Acting HHS secretary Eric Hargan and Seema Verma, administrator of the departmentâs Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said they were stopping the payments based on a legal opinion by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. âIt has been clear for many years that Obamacare is bad policy.Â It is also bad law,â their statement says. âThe Obama Administration unfortunately went ahead and made CSR payments to insurance companies after requesting â but never ultimately receiving â an appropriation from Congress as required by law.âÂ
While the administration will now argue that Congress should appropriate the funds if it wants them to continue, such a proposal will face a serious hurdle on Capitol Hill. In a recent interview, Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), who chairs the House Appropriations Subcommittee overseeing HHS, said it would be difficult to muster support for such a move among House conservatives.
One person familiar with the presidentâs decision said HHS officials and Trumpâs domestic policy advisers had urged him to continue the payments at least through the end of the year.
The cost-sharing payments are separate from a different subsidy that provides federal assistance with premiums to more than four-fifths of the 10 million Americans with ACA coverage.
Word of the presidentâs decision came just hours after he signed the executive order intended to circumvent the ACA by making it easier for individuals and small businesses to buy alternative types of health insurance with lower prices, fewer benefits and weaker government protections.
The White House and allies portrayed the presidentâs move as wielding administrative powers to accomplish what congressional Republicans have failed to achieve: fostering more coverage choices while tearing down the lawâs insurance marketplaces. Until the White Houseâs announcement late Thursday, the executive order represented Trumpâs biggest step to date to reverse the health-care policies of the Obama administration, a central promise since last yearâs presidential campaign.
Critics, who include state insurance commissioners, most of the health-insurance industry and mainstream policy specialists, predict that a proliferation of these other kinds of coverage will have damaging ripple effects, driving up costs for consumers with serious medical conditions and prompting more insurers to flee the lawâs marketplaces. Part of Trumpâs action, they say, will spark court challenges over its legality.
The most far-reaching element of the order instructs a trio of Cabinet departments to rewrite federal rules for âassociation health plansâ â a form of insurance in which small businesses of a similar type band together through an association to negotiate health benefits. These plans have had to meet coverage requirements and consumer protections under the 2010 health-care law, but the administration is likely to exempt them from those rules and let such plans be sold from state to state without insurance licenses in each one.
In addition, the order is designed to expand the availability of short-term insurance policies, which offer limited benefits as a bridge for people between jobs or young adults no longer eligible for their parentsâ health plans. The Obama administration ruled that short-term insurance may not last for more than three months; Trump wants to extend that to nearly a year.
Trumpâs action also is intended to widen employersâ ability to use pretax dollars in âhealth reÂimbursement arrangementsâ to help workers pay for any medical expenses, not just for health policies that meet ACA rules â another reversal of Obama policy.
In a late-morning signing ceremony in the White Houseâs Roosevelt Room, surrounded by supportive small-business owners, Cabinet members and a few Republicans from Capitol Hill, the president spoke in his characteristic superlatives about the effects of his action and what he called âthe Obamacare nightmare.â
Trump said that Thursdayâs move, which will trigger months of regulatory work by federal agencies, âis only the beginning.â He promised âeven more relief and more freedomâ from ACA rules. And although leading GOP lawmakers are eager to move on from their unsuccessful attempts this year to abolish central facets of the 2010 law, Trump said that âwe are going to pressure Congress very strongly to finish the repeal and replace of Obamacare.â
But in an early morning tweet Friday, Trump reached out to Democrats with an appeal to somehow work together on a health-care âfix.â
âThe Democrats ObamaCare is imploding,â Trump wrote. âMassive subsidy payments to their pet insurance companies has stopped. Dems should call me to fix!â
The executive order will fulfill a quest by conservative Republican lawmakers, especially in the House, who have tried for more than two decades to expand the availability of association health plans by allowing them to be sold, unregulated, across state lines. On the other hand, Trumpâs approach conflicts with what he and GOP leaders in Congress have held out as a main health-policy goal â giving each state more discretion over matters of insurance.
Health policy experts in think tanks, academia and the health-care industry pointed out that the orderâs language is fairly broad, so the ensuing fine print in agenciesâ rules will determine whether the impact will be as sweeping or quick as Trump boasted â his directive will provide âmillions of people with Obamacare relief,â he said.
Significant questions that remain include whether individuals will be able to join associations, a point that could raise legal issues; whether the administration will start to let association health plans count toward the ACAâs requirement that most Americans carry insurance; and whether such plans can charge higher prices to small businesses with sicker workers â or refuse to insure them.
A senior administration official, speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity shortly before Trump signed the order, said that the policy changes it sets in motion will require agencies to follow customary procedures to write new rules and solicit public comment. That means new insurance options will not be available in time for coverage beginning in January, he said.
Among policy experts, critics warned that young and healthy people who use relatively little insurance will gravitate to association health plans because of their lower price tags. That would concentrate older and sicker customers in ACA marketplaces with spiking rates.
Selling health plans from state to state without separate licenses â the idea underlying much of the presidentâs order â has long been a Republican mantra. It has gained little traction in practice, however.
Half a dozen states â before the ACA was passed in 2010 as well as since then â have passed laws permitting insurers to sell health policies approved by other states. And since last year, the ACA has allowed âcompactsâ in which groups of states can agree that health plans licensed in any of them could be sold in the others. Under such compacts, federal health officials must make sure the plans offer at least the same benefits and are as affordable as those sold in the ACA marketplaces.
As of this summer, âno state was known to actually offer or sell such policies,â according to a report by the National Conference of State Legislatures. A main reason, experts say, is insurersâ difficulty in arranging networks of doctors and other providers of care far from their home states.
Abby Phillip contributed to this report.