Gorsuch debate begins with no signs filibuster showdown will be avoided – Washington Post

The U.S. Senate began formally debating the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday with no sign that Democrats and Republicans are seriously trying to avoid changing the rules of the chamber to ensure his confirmation.

Democrats now have the votes they need to block a procedural vote and compel President Trump and Republicans either to withdraw Gorsuch’s nomination or to change Senate rules to eliminate the 60-vote requirement.

For weeks, Republicans have warned that they will change the chamber’s procedures if Democrats block Gorsuch and are vowing to confirm the 49-year old federal appeals court judge by Friday.

With the opposition holding firm, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) warned on Tuesday that a Democratic filibuster would be “truly detrimental to this body and to the country.” He faulted Democrats for “hurtling toward the abyss and taking the Senate with them. They need to reconsider.”

But Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said that an impasse could still be avoided if Trump and Senate Republicans negotiated with Democrats to select a new nominee.

“There are mainstream Republican nominees who can earn adequate Democratic support,” Schumer said — but he once again declined to suggest new potential nominees.

In a sign that at least some senators still want to avoid the showdown, Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.) said that even though he plans to vote against Gorsuch and support the Democratic filibuster, he is willing to work on an agreement that would stave off changes to how the Senate confirms Supreme Court justices.

“There are Democrats and Republicans who I hope will be talking this week, in the next two days, to see if we could find some path forward where we preserve the filibuster,” Coons said in a CNN interview.

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, said that he had been discussing a potential compromise with Democrats as recently as Monday, but admitted “I haven’t made a real push” to reach an agreement.

Confirmation for the sitting Supreme Court justices were not nearly as partisan as Judge Gorsuch

Plans for a Democratic filibuster “are stupid. I think it’s a big mistake,” he added.

Signaling that any hopes of a compromise are likely dead, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who was able to successfully broker past disputes on judicial nominees thanks to his close relationship with several Democrats, said that this time he is done trying.

Talks between Democrats and Republicans in the last few days “didn’t go anywhere,” he told reporters, but declined to specify areas of disagreement.

McCain was part of a 2005 agreement between 14 senators of both parties to preserve the filibuster and allow the confirmation of several of former president George W. Bush’s federal court nominees.

But negotiations aren’t possible in today’s Senate “because there’s much more partisanship, there’s much more outside influence on both ends of the spectrum, and you don’t have the kind of comity that you had in those times,” McCain said. “They were tough partisan times, but when it came crunchtime we sat down together.”

With all Republicans expected to vote to confirm Gorsuch, just a few Democratic holdouts remain. Three Democrats — Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Joe Manchin III (W. Va.) say they plan to support Gorsuch. Sen. Michael F. Bennet (D-Colo.), who represents Gorsuch’s home state, says he won’t support the filibuster but has yet to signal whether he would vote to confirm Gorsuch. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) is one of the few holdouts, and said on Tuesday that he isn’t ready yet to announce a decision.

Gorsuch was nominated by Trump on Jan. 31 and spent weeks privately meeting with senators and preparing for his confirmation hearings. He was questioned by the Judiciary Committee last month for almost 20 hours over three days, answering nearly 1,200 questions and later sending about 70 pages of answers to written follow-up questions, according to a team of White House officials assisting with his nomination.

As of Friday, Gorsuch had met with 78 senators — all but some of the most conservative and liberal lawmakers, whose votes are likely to fall along party lines. But three first-term Democratic senators, Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Tammy Duckworth (Ill.) and Kamala D. Harris (Calif.), complained that they were unable to get a face-to-face meeting with the nominee or were not offered the opportunity.

This week’s anticipated change in Senate procedure dates to 2013, when Democrats, angered by Republican opposition to then-President Barack Obama’s nominees voted to end filibusters of executive branch and lower-court nominees. Republicans warned then that there might one day be retribution.

“Changing the rules is almost inevitable; it’s only a question of when,” said Norm Ornstein, a longtime congressional expert and resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

Ornstein warned that with Republicans set to extend the filibuster ban to Supreme Court nominees, they may soon face pressure to end filibusters of legislation to keep major health-care and tax reform bills passed by the GOP-led House from stalling in the more closely divided Senate.

McConnell “will resist the change in some cases because it’s in his interest not only when he’s in the minority again but also to be able to rely on Democrats when the House sends you crazy things,” Ornstein said. “And because it’s not clear they have the 51 votes necessary to change the rules for filibusters on legislation.”

But McConnell said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that “I don’t think the legislative filibuster is in danger.”

Schumer, appearing on the same program, agreed. “I don’t think there’s any thirst to change the legislative rules,” he said. “Most Democrats and most Republicans have served in both the minority and majority and know what it means.”


Write a Reply or Comment:

Your email address will not be published.*